Kako pregledati crtež prijenosnog uzemljenja prije proizvodnje: Kontrolna lista za odobrenje kupca
A portable earthing set should not enter production only because the purchase order has been issued.
For custom or project-based portable earthing and short-circuiting equipment, the supplier normally needs to convert the approved RFQ, technical schedule, connection-point information, cable arrangement, clamps, and fault-duty requirement into a controlled assembly drawing.
That drawing becomes an important pre-production control document.
For utility buyers, EPC contractors, consultants, and technical procurement teams, the main review question is not:
Does the drawing look complete?
A stronger question is:
Does the proposed production drawing accurately represent the approved project requirement, and is the configuration supported by the required technical evidence?
The key approval chain is:
Approved RFQ → Supplier Drawing → Technical Review → Comments → Revised Drawing → Approval → Release for Production → FAT
The purpose of drawing approval is to identify configuration errors before manufacturing begins.
Pridržavajte se lokalnih propisa i sigurnosnih postupaka na vašem gradilištu.
Quick Answer: What Must Be Approved Before Manufacturing?
Before releasing a portable earthing set for production, buyers should confirm:
- Broj crteža i revizija
- Correct project and PO reference
- Approved connection topology
- Number of phase and earth leads
- Individual cable cross-sections
- Pojedinačne duljine kabela
- Phase clamp models and interfaces
- Earth clamp model and interface
- Ferule i završeci
- Connecting cluster or common point
- Operating pole and adapters
- Fault-current duty reference
- Compatibility with supporting test evidence
- BOM consistency
- Označavanje i sljedivost
- Declared technical deviations
- Closed review comments
- Final production-release status
A strong drawing-review process follows:
Specification → Configuration → Interfaces → Evidence → Revision Control → Approval
The drawing should translate an approved procurement requirement into a manufacturable assembly.
It should not silently rewrite the requirement.
For the upstream specification stage, see Kako specificirati prijenosni komplet za uzemljenje u ponudi.
Why the Production Drawing Is a Control Document
A portable earthing set may contain:
- Fazne stezaljke
- Stezaljka za uzemljenje
- Fleksibilni vodiči
- Fazni vodiči
- Uzemljenje
- ferrules
- stopice
- Povezivanje klastera
- Zajednička točka spajanja
- Adapteri
- Izolacijski upravljački stup
- Pribor za pohranu
These components work as one system.
The drawing should therefore do more than show the product shape.
It should define the approved configuration.
A controlled production drawing helps connect:
Zahtjev kupca
do
Supplier proposal
do
Proizvodnja
do
FAT
do
Isporučeni proizvod
If that link is weak, problems often appear later as:
- Wrong cable lengths
- Wrong clamp models
- Incorrect topology
- Nedostaje pribor
- Unsupported substitutions
- BOM differences
- Fault-duty evidence that applies to another configuration
These issues are much easier to correct before production.
Step 1: Confirm Drawing Number, Revision, and Project Reference
Before reviewing the technical details, confirm that you are reviewing the correct document.
Ček:
- Drawing title
- Broj crteža
- Broj revizije
- Datum revizije
- Kupac
- Projekt
- Narudžbenica
- Tender or contract reference
- Model dobavljača
- broj predmeta
- Prepared-by information
- Checked-by information
- Status odobrenja
This seems simple, but revision control is one of the most important parts of pre-production approval.
Na primjer:
Revision A
- 50 mm² kabela
- 1.5 m phase leads
- 3 m earth lead
- Clamp model A
Revision B
- 70 mm² kabela
- 2 m phase leads
- 5 m earth lead
- Clamp model B
If the project approved Revision B but production uses Revision A, the final product can be wrong even though both drawings look technically complete.
Check the revision before checking the components.
Do not release production from an uncontrolled screenshot, quotation attachment, or old email drawing when the project requires formal document control.
Step 2: Compare the Drawing With the Approved RFQ
The next step is to compare the supplier drawing with the approved procurement requirement.
Review the major engineering inputs:
- primjena
- AC ili DC sustav
- Kontekst sustava
- Odobreni radni režim za struju kratkog spoja
- Nazivno vrijeme
- Peak-current requirement where applicable
- Broj faza
- Raspored uzemljenja
- Priključne točke
- Presjek kabela
- Duljine kabela
- Stezne sučelja
- Priključak uzemljenja
- Zahtjev za operativni pol
- Modni dodaci
- obilježavanje
- Dokumentacija
The supplier drawing should reflect the accepted technical offer.
It should not introduce new assumptions.
For example, if the RFQ states:
70 mm² flexible copper conductors
the production drawing should not show:
50 mm²
without an approved technical deviation.
Likewise, if the project requires:
flat-busbar phase clamps
the supplier should not replace them with another clamp type without declaring the change.
The supplier drawing should translate the approved specification into a manufacturable assembly, not silently modify the specification.
Step 3: Verify the Connection Topology
“Three-phase portable earthing set” does not define one universal arrangement.
The drawing should clearly show how the complete current path is arranged.
Ček:
- Broj faznih stezaljki
- Broj faznih vodova
- Međufazne veze
- Put faze prema zemlji
- Zajednički klaster
- Individual earth leads
- Common earth lead
- Raspored grana
- Neutralni priključak gdje je primjenjivo
- Earth connection point
A buyer should be able to understand the electrical topology without guessing from the cable count.
Na primjer, projekt može zahtijevati:
Three phase branches → common cluster → one earth lead
ili:
Tri neovisna vodiča faza-zemlja
These are different assemblies.
Za detaljno objašnjenje pogledajte fazno-fazni i fazno-zemni spojevi u prijenosnim uzemljivačima.
During drawing approval, the question is simpler:
Does the supplier drawing show the same topology that the engineer approved?
Step 4: Review Every Cable and Lead Separately
Do not approve the drawing from one general cable statement.
A multi-phase assembly may contain several different lead lengths.
Review each lead separately.
A useful schedule can look like this:
| Olovo | Dirigent | Poprečni presjek | Dužina | Od | Do |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faza A | Bakar | 70 mm² | Vrijednost projekta | Phase clamp | grozd |
| Faza B | Bakar | 70 mm² | Vrijednost projekta | Phase clamp | grozd |
| Faza C | Bakar | 70 mm² | Vrijednost projekta | Phase clamp | grozd |
| Uzemljenje | Bakar | 70 mm² | Vrijednost projekta | grozd | Stezaljka za uzemljenje |
Depending on the project, also confirm:
- Kabelska konstrukcija
- Sheath or insulation
- Boja
- Flexible conductor requirement
- Identifikacija
- Vrsta raskida
Avoid one vague drawing note such as:
Cable length: 5 m.
That does not explain whether 5 m refers to:
- Every phase lead
- Ukupna duljina kabela
- Uzemljenje
- Jedna grana
- Kompletna montaža
For technical approval, each important lead should be identifiable.
Step 5: Compare Lead Lengths With Site Geometry
Cable length should not be approved from the supplier drawing alone.
Compare the proposed lengths with the actual connection geometry.
Useful engineering inputs include:
- Fazni razmak
- Razmak sabirnica
- Širina opreme
- Connection-point position
- Lokacija točke Zemlje
- Visina opreme
- Dubina ormara
- Odobrena kabelska ruta
- Ograničenje pristupa
The purpose is not to create a field installation procedure.
Svrha je odgovoriti na:
Does the proposed assembly physically fit the approved connection points?
For example, an earth lead that is technically suitable in cross-section may still be unsuitable if the approved earth point is farther away than the proposed cable can reach.
Likewise, excessively long leads may affect:
- Rukovanje
- Čuvanje
- Usmjeravanje
- Assembly geometry
- Tehnički dokazi
Do not approve cable length from the principle:
Longer is safer.
The required length should come from the approved project geometry.
Step 6: Match Phase and Earth Clamps to the Actual Interfaces
Riječi:
universal clamp
are not enough for drawing approval.
Each clamp should be linked to a real connection point.
For phase clamps, review:
- Model stezaljke
- Dizajn čeljusti
- Raspon otvaranja čeljusti
- Flat or round conductor interface
- Busbar dimensions
- Promjer vodiča
- Ball-stud interface where applicable
- Dizajn kontaktne površine
- Kabelska veza
- Sučelje operativnog pola
For the earth clamp, review:
- Zemljana šipka
- Šipka
- Klinac
- Fixed terminal
- Structural earth point
- Other approved connection geometry
The drawing or BOM should identify which clamp is used at each location.
A clamp should be approved against an interface, not only against a product name.
A photograph may help explain the site condition, but dimensions are more useful when clamp fit depends on geometry.
Step 7: Review Ferrules, Terminations, and the Connecting Cluster
Cable cross-section is only one part of the current path.
The drawing package should also identify how the flexible conductor connects to:
- Phase clamp
- Stezaljka za uzemljenje
- Povezivanje klastera
- Srpanj
- Završni spoj
Recenzija:
- Ferrule reference
- Lug reference where applicable
- Cable-to-clamp connection
- Cable-to-cluster connection
- Završni spoj
- Strain-relief arrangement where specified
- Component reference
The production drawing does not always need to show every manufacturing detail.
However, the termination should be defined well enough to prevent uncontrolled substitution.
Do not approve the conductor size while leaving the termination undefined.
For detailed termination inspection criteria, see grounding cable terminations: ferrules, lugs, and clamp connections.
Do Not Ignore the Cluster
For clustered multi-phase sets, the common connection point is part of the complete current path.
Ček:
- Cluster model
- Broj grana
- Način spajanja kabela
- Earth-lead connection
- Component reference
- Arrangement in the assembly
A cluster is not simply an accessory between several cables.
Its configuration can be relevant to the complete assembly evidence.
Step 8: Compare the Production Drawing With Fault-Duty Evidence
This is one of the most important approval steps.
The drawing may look correct geometrically but still differ from the configuration supported by the supplier’s test evidence.
For portable earthing and short-circuiting equipment, buyers should review:
- Nazivna struja
- Nazivno vrijeme
- Osnova vršne struje
- Presjek kabela
- Duljine kabela
- Fazne stezaljke
- Stezaljka za uzemljenje
- ferrules
- grozd
- Raspored grana
- Complete tested configuration
The production drawing should be compared with the drawing or configuration referenced by the supporting evidence.
Na primjer:
Testirana konfiguracija
- 70 mm² conductor
- Clamp A
- Ferrule F1
- Cluster C1
- Defined branch arrangement
Proposed Production Drawing
- 50 mm² conductor
- Stezaljka B
- Ferrule F2
- Cluster C2
- Different lead arrangement
These should not automatically be treated as the same product because both documents show:
25 kA.
A buyer should ask:
Does the available fault-duty evidence actually support the configuration shown on the production drawing?
For a detailed rating review, see nazivna struja kratkog spoja za prijenosni komplet za uzemljenje.
Compare Three Technical Configurations Before Approval
A strong review normally connects three different engineering references.
1. Project Requirement
This describes what the site needs.
Može uključivati:
- Priključne točke
- Required topology
- Dužnost pri kvaru
- Udaljenosti
- Uvjeti pristupa
2. Tested Configuration
This shows what the supplier’s technical evidence actually supports.
It may identify:
- Kabel
- Spona
- ferula
- grozd
- Dogovor o olovu
- Test duty
3. Proposed Production Drawing
This shows what the factory intends to manufacture.
Before approval:
Production Drawing must match the Project Requirement
i
Technical Evidence must support the Production Drawing
After manufacturing, a fourth comparison is added:
4. Finished Product
That becomes part of FAT.
This creates a clean evidence chain:
Project requirement → Tested configuration → Approved production drawing → Finished assembly
Step 9: Check the Drawing Against the BOM
Do not review the assembly drawing without the Bill of Materials.
A drawing can be technically correct while the BOM still contains the wrong component.
Na primjer:
crtanje
Phase clamp: C-100
DOBRO
Phase clamp: C-120
If manufacturing follows the BOM, the finished equipment may not match the approved drawing.
Ček:
- Drawing item number
- BOM item number
- Naziv komponente
- Dio broj
- Količina
- Material where specified
- Revizija komponente
- Model dobavljača
Typical BOM items may include:
- Fazne stezaljke
- Stezaljka za uzemljenje
- Phase cables
- Zemaljski kabel
- ferrules
- stopice
- grozd
- Adapteri
- Upravljački stup
- Pole head
- Vreća za pohranu
- Papir za naljepnice i etikete
- Modni dodaci
A correct drawing with an inconsistent BOM can still produce the wrong product.
Both documents should be aligned before production release.
Step 10: Confirm Operating Poles, Adapters, and Accessories
Portable earthing set drawings often focus on cables and clamps.
Do not forget the operating equipment.
If the supply includes an insulating operating pole, confirm:
- Tip pola
- Fixed, sectional, or telescopic design
- Potrebna radna duljina
- Sklopljena duljina gdje je relevantno
- Vrsta glave
- Stezni interfejs
- adapter
- Vreća za pohranu
- Količina
The most important interface question is:
Does the operating pole actually connect to the selected clamp mechanism?
A correct pole and a correct clamp can still be incompatible if their interfaces differ.
Also confirm other project accessories such as:
- Kućište za pohranu
- Torba za transport
- Rezervne stezaljke
- Spare adapters
- Papir za naljepnice i etikete
- Inspekcijske oznake
If these are part of the approved supply scope, they should appear in the drawing package or BOM.
Step 11: Define Marking and Traceability Before Production
Do not wait until FAT to decide how the product will be identified.
The approved technical package should define the required marking system.
Ovisno o projektu, to može uključivati:
- ID kompleta
- Serijski broj
- Identifikacija kabela
- Presjek kabela
- Duljina kabela
- Clamp ID
- Component number
- Broj imovine kupca
- Referenca serije
- Rating reference
- QR kod
- Naziv projekta
The identification system should connect:
Physical set → production record → drawing → test evidence → FAT record → delivery documents
For lifecycle control, see identifikacija i sljedivost prijenosnih setova za uzemljenje.
If markings must appear in specific positions, define them before manufacturing.
Ovo je posebno korisno za:
- Velike narudžbe
- Multiple kit configurations
- Utility projects
- EPC packages
- Projects with component-level traceability
Step 12: Identify Technical Deviations
A supplier drawing should not hide technical deviations.
Suppose the RFQ requires:
70 mm² copper conductor.
The supplier drawing shows:
50 mm².
The buyer should not be expected to discover that difference manually without a deviation statement.
Likewise, deviations may include:
- Different clamp model
- Different conductor material
- Different cable length
- Different topology
- Different ferrule
- Different cluster
- Different operating pole
- Different accessories
- Different marking
- Different supporting evidence
A strong technical submittal separates:
Compliant requirement
iz
Odobrena alternativa
iz
Technical deviation
Every material technical deviation should be declared, not hidden inside a revised drawing.
This makes approval more transparent and protects both buyer and supplier from later disputes.
Step 13: Control Review Comments and Drawing Revisions
Drawing comments should be traceable.
Izbjegavajte oslanjanje samo na:
- WhatsApp poruke
- Verbal discussions
- Marked screenshots
- Uncontrolled email instructions
For project orders, use a comment register or controlled drawing-markup process.
Na primjer:
| Review Comment | Odgovor dobavljača | Revizija | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Earth lead length does not match approved layout | Revised to project value | Rev.B | Zatvoreno |
| Earth clamp interface unclear | Clamp detail added | Rev.B | Zatvoreno |
| Test report reference missing | Added to technical schedule | Rev.B | Zatvoreno |
| Kit ID location not shown | Marking position added | Rev.C | Zatvoreno |
The purpose is not to create unnecessary paperwork.
It is to make sure:
The factory knows exactly which comments have been incorporated into the production version.
Drawing Approval Status Should Be Clear
Different EPC companies, utilities, and consultants use different approval codes.
A project may use statuses such as:
| Status pregleda | Tipično značenje |
|---|---|
| Odobren | Drawing can proceed under project procedure |
| Approved with comments | Comments must be incorporated as specified |
| Revise and resubmit | Production should not proceed from the submitted version |
| Odbijen | Proposed configuration is not accepted |
The exact terminology should follow the contract.
Do not assume every organization uses the same approval code.
Važna točka je:
The manufacturing team should be able to tell whether the drawing is formally released for production.
A Purchase Order Is Not Automatically a Drawing Approval
This distinction matters for custom equipment.
A buyer may issue the PO first and complete technical submittal approval afterward.
U tom slučaju:
Narudžbenica
ne znači automatski:
Approved for Production
unless the contract specifically says otherwise.
For project-specific portable earthing equipment, a controlled workflow may be:
PO issued
↓
Supplier drawing submitted
↓
Buyer comments
↓
Revised drawing
↓
Tehničko odobrenje
↓
Puštanje u proizvodnju
This reduces the risk of manufacturing an assembly that later needs to be changed.
When Is a Drawing Ready for Production Release?
Before approving manufacturing, ask:
Is the revision correct?
No open revision conflict.
Does the drawing match the RFQ?
No uncontrolled technical change.
Is the topology correct?
The required current path is clear.
Are all important leads defined?
Cross-section and individual length are shown.
Are clamps matched to real interfaces?
No generic or assumed interface.
Are terminations and cluster defined?
The complete current path is controlled.
Does the evidence support the configuration?
No unexplained gap between tested and offered design.
Does the BOM match the drawing?
No component inconsistency.
Are operating poles and accessories included?
The complete scope is controlled.
Are markings defined?
Traceability can be implemented during manufacturing.
Are all technical deviations approved?
No hidden alternative.
Are review comments closed?
No unresolved technical action.
If these questions cannot be answered, production release may be premature.
Portable Earthing Set Drawing Review Checklist
| Drawing Review Item | Kupac treba potvrditi |
|---|---|
| Broj crteža | Controlled document number |
| Revizija | Latest reviewed revision |
| Projekt | Correct project/customer |
| PO reference | Pravilan redosljed |
| konfiguracija | Ispravna montaža |
| Topologija | Correct phase-to-phase and earth path |
| kabel materijal | Matches approved requirement |
| Presjek kabela | Correct for each lead |
| Duljine faznih vodova | Each lead defined |
| Duljina uzemljenja | Defined separately |
| Fazne stezaljke | Correct models and interfaces |
| Stezaljka za uzemljenje | Correct earth-point interface |
| ferrules | Correct termination reference |
| grozd | Correct arrangement |
| Upravljački stup | Correct type, length, and interface |
| Adapteri | Ispravno i potpuno |
| Modni dodaci | Complete approved scope |
| Dužnost pri kvaru | Approved current/time/peak reference |
| Dokazi iz testa | Supports proposed configuration |
| DOBRO | Matches the drawing |
| obilježavanje | Product identification defined |
| Sljedivost | Kit/component IDs defined |
| odstupanja | Declared and approved |
| Review comments | Zatvoreno |
| Status odobrenja | Released according to project procedure |
This checklist can be used as a practical technical-review worksheet before manufacturing begins.
Common Drawing Approval Mistakes
Approving From the Product Name Alone
“Three-phase grounding set” does not define the complete assembly.
Reviewing an Obsolete Revision
Production may follow different technical data from the approved version.
Checking Cable Cross-Section but Not Individual Lengths
Correct cable size does not prove correct geometry.
Ignoring Actual Clamp Interfaces
A clamp must match the physical connection point.
Approving Topology Without Checking Site Geometry
A theoretically correct arrangement may still not fit the intended connection points.
Not Comparing the Drawing With Test Evidence
The production configuration may differ from the tested configuration.
Ignoring Ferrules and Terminations
The cable-to-clamp interface is part of the complete current path.
Ignoring the Connecting Cluster
The common point can be part of the supported assembly configuration.
Allowing the BOM to Differ From the Drawing
Manufacturing may follow the wrong component list.
Leaving Operating-Pole Interfaces Undefined
The supplied pole may not fit the clamp mechanism.
Accepting Hidden Technical Deviations
Differences should be declared before approval.
Approving Through Uncontrolled Messages
The factory may not know which revision is final.
Starting Production Before Comments Are Closed
The project may later require rework.
Waiting Until FAT to Discover a Drawing Error
FAT should verify production against an approved drawing, not become the first detailed engineering review.
How We Review a Portable Earthing Set Drawing Before Production
When we prepare a project-specific portable earthing set for production, we review the technical package in a fixed sequence.
We Confirm the Current Drawing Revision
We make sure engineering, production, sales, and the customer are reviewing the same document.
We Compare the Drawing With the Approved RFQ
We check the required fault duty, interfaces, topology, cables, accessories, and documentation.
We Confirm the Connection Topology
We identify the phase and earth current path clearly.
We Check Each Lead Separately
We review conductor material, cross-section, and length for each phase and earth lead.
We Compare the Layout With Site Geometry
We review the approved connection distances and interface information supplied by the customer.
We Match Each Clamp to Its Connection Point
Phase clamps and earth clamps are checked against the actual interface.
We Review Ferrules and the Cluster
The complete current path is reviewed as one assembly.
We Compare the Drawing With Technical Evidence
We check whether the proposed production configuration remains supported by the declared fault-duty evidence.
We Compare the Drawing With the BOM
Component references and quantities should agree.
We Confirm Operating Poles and Accessories
The complete delivery scope is reviewed before release.
We Define Marking and Traceability
Kit IDs and component identification are included in the production requirements where required.
We Record Technical Deviations
Any proposed difference from the approved requirement is made visible.
We Close Review Comments
A revised controlled drawing is issued when technical changes are required.
We Release the Approved Revision to Production
Manufacturing should follow the final controlled document.
After production, the next control point is FAT.
Naši factory acceptance checklist for portable earthing and short-circuiting sets explains how the finished assembly should then be compared with the approved drawing.
FAQ About Portable Earthing Set Drawing Approval
Should a Portable Earthing Set Drawing Be Approved Before Production?
For custom, project, tender, or technically controlled orders, drawing approval is often an important part of the supplier-submittal process. The exact approval requirement should follow the contract, purchaser specification, and project procedure.
What Should a Portable Earthing Set Drawing Show?
It should identify the complete configuration, including topology, cables, individual lengths, phase clamps, earth clamp, terminations, cluster, operating pole, accessories, relevant technical references, and identification requirements.
Is a Quotation Drawing the Same as an Approved Production Drawing?
Not automatically. A quotation drawing may be preliminary. The production drawing should reflect the final approved technical configuration and controlled revision.
Should the Test-Report Drawing Match the Production Drawing?
The buyer should be able to understand how the available technical evidence relates to the proposed production configuration. Material differences should be declared and reviewed.
Does an Approved Drawing Prove the Fault-Current Rating?
No. The drawing defines the proposed configuration. The declared fault-duty rating still needs suitable supporting technical evidence.
Should Each Cable Length Be Shown Separately?
For multi-lead assemblies, this is good procurement practice because different phase and earth leads may require different lengths.
What Happens if the Supplier Changes a Clamp After Drawing Approval?
The change should be technically reviewed. Depending on the project and significance of the change, a revised drawing, deviation approval, and review of supporting evidence may be required before production continues.
Is a Purchase Order Enough to Start Manufacturing?
That depends on the contract. If technical drawing approval is required, PO issuance should not automatically be treated as production approval.
Praktični sažetak za kupca
A portable earthing set drawing should be reviewed as a configuration-control document, not as a product illustration.
Prije proizvodnje, potvrdite:
- Broj crteža
- Revizija
- Referenca projekta
- Topologija veze
- kabel materijal
- Presjeci kabela
- Individual lead lengths
- Fazne stezaljke
- Stezaljka za uzemljenje
- ferrules
- otkazi
- Povezivanje klastera
- Upravljački stup
- Adapteri
- Modni dodaci
- Fault-duty reference
- Supporting technical evidence
- DOBRO
- obilježavanje
- Sljedivost
- Tehnička odstupanja
- Review comments
- Status odobrenja
The strongest approval chain is:
Approved RFQ → Site and Interface Data → Supplier Drawing → BOM → Technical Evidence → Comment Closure → Approved Revision → Production → FAT
The drawing-review stage is where the buyer can confirm that the factory is about to manufacture the correct assembly.
FAT comes later.
FAT should verify that the finished product matches the approved production drawing.
It should not be the first time the project discovers that the cable lengths, clamps, topology, or BOM were wrong.
For the full procurement sequence, buyers can start with Kako specificirati prijenosni komplet za uzemljenje u ponudi, recenzija Nazivne vrijednosti struje kratkog spoja za prijenosni komplet za uzemljenje, and then use our portable earthing set FAT checklist after manufacturing.
For available configurations, see our prijenosni setovi za uzemljenje i kratko spajanje.
Pridržavajte se lokalnih propisa i sigurnosnih postupaka na vašem gradilištu.


